Commons talk:Licensing
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Commons:Licensing.
- This is not a forum for general discussion of the page's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (
~~~~
). - New to Commons? Check out the project scope. Ask questions, get answers.
For discussions of specific copyright questions, please go to Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Discussions that do not relate to changes to the page Commons:Licensing may be moved, with participants notified with the template {{subst:moved to VPC|Commons talk:Licensing}}
.
For old discussions, see the Archives. Recent sections with no replies for 60 days may be archived.
Seven 2006/2007 discussions organized as subpages, ignoringincl. comments added in 2014:
Explicit permission from photographer
[edit]If I were to gain explicit permission from a photographer to use their photo of an individual on a BLP would it be allowed even if the original photo is not under the permitted CC licensing protocols? Robertclarke32 (talk) 20:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Robertclarke32: No. We need a free license. Permission to use in Wikimedia/Wikipedia is not enough. Yann (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- But if you can convince them to license the photo with a free licence, such as CC-BY-SA-4.0, then it can indeed be uploaded. They can still give different licence term elsewhere (but anybody is allowed to copy the image from here under the free licence). –LPfi (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Robertclarke32: you may find Commons:Uploading works by a third party useful, especially the later sections (skim till it starts to look relevant). - Jmabel ! talk 23:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)